Google announces that search results will be different for mobile and PC versions

There is only a preconception that it will be quite troublesome if you say what this means, but ...Different search results for smartphones and PCs. It may be troublesome for those who used conventional search.

Should we divide the weight of search results by country?

But there is more to it than that, Google!

Different search results for smartphones and PCs

The following articles introduce the current issue.

>> 【Important announcement】 Google announces separation of mobile version and PC version! Planned implementation within a few months

Until now, different results were shown in the search results of PC version and smartphone version. However, it can be said that there is only a slight advantage in whether or not it is compatible with smartphones. 

If this is actually equipped, it is ugly and has a major impact on search inflows.

Many books on SEO have been published.

The books I have are as follows.

>> Click here for other books and DVDs

However, it is a person who thinks that it is going to be a suspicious road from the point that DVD is increasing.

Reference

>> SEO Association? Preparation was done

This time, it is not the case that the main axis of the search result is moved to the smartphone suddenly, I think that Google has been preparing steadily.

Since Search-console has previously sent separate requests for smartphones and PCs for "Fetch as Google", it may be better to think that it is ready this time.

It may be troublesome for those who used conventional search

In my case, I often forget to bookmark even if I find an information site that I want to know when I go on the go, and sometimes I try to get a good idea of ​​what I knew then on my computer after returning home. At that time, I remember only the keywords I searched.

It will be similar search results, so I think that it is better to search again at home.

But there is also a possibility that this will not be possible. There is also a possibility that totally different results will be displayed on smartphones and PCs.

This feels quite inconvenient for those who are looking lightly with a smartphone and looking closely at their home PC.

Besides, there are many inconvenient keywords in the search results optimized for smartphones. The station square keyword in a typical example. Since the distinction between the keywords in front of the station and the local keywords is not correct, Google can be quite inconvenient in search results.

However, if you try to actually start, it may result in not having changed so much, and I think that you do not know that it has actually started for a while.

Should we divide the weight of search results by country?

Recently AMP support is required! There are also SEO companies that talk about it, but I think that if the communication environment of the smartphone becomes 5G, I think that AMP will do nothing else. Even if it is not crowded even with 4G, AMP support is sometimes difficult to see on the contrary.

So I think in countries where communication environment is developing, it is not necessary to give priority to the display speed. Conversely, in countries where the communication environment has not developed, it can be seen that priority is given to display speed. However, the technology to make the display speed faster as in the country where the communication environment is developed is widespread, and the technology to make the display speed faster as in the country where the communication environment is not developed is also a difficult problem. but.

Of course, the speed changes considerably depending on the connection destination server and the program being used (WP version etc. in case of PHP etc.) apart from the communication environment.

But there is more to it than that, Google!

However, I think that there is something that Google should do more than this announcement. It is an algorithm such as dropping negative search results by judging negative elements in the spreading direction of blogs and SNS etc. and having many dissenting opinions.

Speaking of what it means, there are people who write articles for the purpose of the flame. Some people simply go for the purpose of increasing firepower and ad hoc PV, but sometimes they are going for the purpose of collecting links by fire.

Burning can be easily accomplished by writing flammable contents. For example, now homeopathy acclaimed articles.

It is wrong when you burn up! Because the blog which mentions comes out, it is the translation which causes the fire on purpose by aiming at the increase of the to-link. Even in such a dirty method, the to-link is a to-link and Google evaluates it as a to-link. That's why similar non-science articles and articles of D company come to the top of the search results of Google.

Recently, there is a style that mentions Web site, but when you think about copyright, it is a wrong response. Again, the source should be the copyright holder's site.

That's why Google has been thinking for over a year that it wants you to quickly incorporate an algorithm for negative element judgment, yes.

Of course, there are pros and cons in any way of thinking, so I understand that it is difficult, but I think that there is nothing that can not be done.

So far, Google's search results are divided between PC and smartphone, and it was about Google's bad habit.

Tweet